Tuesday, March 12, 2024

Ickes, Cisneros and Bacon Win

Newcomer Kelly Ickes won Durham's town-specific school board seat, incumbent Brian Cisneros won Lee's seat, and member Matt Bacon won Madbury's seat in today's election.  Michael Williams remains moderator; he ran unopposed.  Congratulations to all the winners.

YES won on all school district questions, including the $56.2M budget appropriation; congratulations to the District.

Thanks to wonderful outgoing members Tom Newkirk and Dan Klein for their 11 years and 9 years of service on the board, respectively.  

The election of Matt Bacon to Madbury's seat means that he will resign the at-large seat he currently holds.  The board has the duty to appoint someone for the remaining year of Bacon's at-large term; my guess is they will appoint the next-highest vote getter, Renee Beauregard-Bennett from Lee.

Though Madbury's results are still not in, Lee's own Erik Johnson (D) appears to have won the special election for state representative from Lee/Dover/Madbury.  Congratulations, Erik!  The state house currently leans slightly Republican, but the majority is really determined by who shows up at the legislature on any particular voting day (FostersUnion Leader).

I'm still on vacation with a terrible Internet connection, so I'm just going to paste the results here (thanks Todd Selig) and finish this post when I get home tomorrow.

[Edit 3/16]  It's been a few days.  I'll update in my district history in spreadsheet form and calculate percentages.  I'm not sure what if anything was the overall issue in this election; let's say inflation.



SCHOOL DISTRICT UNOFFICIAL RESULTS (Durham, Lee, and Madbury Combined Ballots from all three precincts.)

 

 

ARTICLE 1:

For Moderator (1 Year) (Vote for not more than one)

Michael Williams - 1525   ELECTED

 

 

ARTICLE 2:

For School Board - Lee (3 years) (Vote for not more than one)

Renee Beauregard Bennett - 347    25.6%

Rebecca Blake - 285                      21.0%

Brian Cisneros - 726                       53.5%   ELECTED

 

For School Board - Durham (3 Years) (Vote for not more than one)

Jason Kolligs - 82        6.1%

Stephanie Pitts - 210  15.6%

Andrea Chan - 142      10.5%

John Colwell - 158      11.7%

Kelly Ickes - 754          56.0%   ELECTED

 

For School Board - Madbury (3 Years) (Vote for not more than one)

 

Matt Bacon - 369   87.4%   ELECTED

Others - 53            12.6%

 

ARTICLE 3:

Shall the District raise and appropriate as an operating budget, not including appropriations by special warrant article and other appropriations voted separately, the amount set forth on the budget posted with the warrant or as amended by vote of the first session, for the purposes set forth therein, totaling $56,248,037. Should this article be defeated, the operating budget shall be $55,929,305 (Default Budget) which is the same as last year with certain adjustments required by previous action of the District or by law; or the District may hold one special meeting in accordance with RSA 40:1 3, X, and XVI to take up the issue of the revised operating budget only. The School Board recommends this appropriation. (Majority vote required)

 

Note: Fund 10 = $54,415,352 (regular operating budget); Fund 21 = $1,191,685 (expenditures from food service revenues); Fund 22 = $600,000 (expenditures from federal/special revenues); Fund 23 = $41,000 (expenditures from pass through funds).

 

YES - 1208  74.4%    PASSED

NO -  415    23.1%

 

 

ARTICLE 4:

Shall the District vote to approve within the provisions of New Hampshire RSA 273-A:3 the cost items included in the collective bargaining agreement reached between the Oyster River Intervention and Tutors Association and the Oyster River School Board which calls for the following increases in salaries and benefits at the current staffing levels:

2024-2025 $139,846.63

2025-2026 $ 35,219.00

2026-2027 $ 18,695.59

and further to raise and appropriate the sum of $139,846.63 for the 2024-2025 fiscal year, such sum representing the additional costs attributable to the increases in salaries and benefits required by the new agreement over those that would be paid at current staffing levels?  The School Board recommends this appropriation. (Majority vote required)

 

YES - 1367   76.9%    PASSED

NO - 411      23.1%

 

ARTICLE 5:

Shall the District vote to raise and appropriate the sum of $125,000 to be added to the Facilities Development, Maintenance, and Replacement Trust which was established in March of 2017.This sum to come from June 30 fund balance available for transfer on July 1. The School Board recommends this appropriation. (Majority vote required) No amounts to be raised from taxation.

 

YES - 1408   92.3%    PASSED

NO - 118       7.7%

 

ARTICLE 6:

Shall the District establish an Artificial Turf Field Replacement Expendable Trust Fund under the provisions of RSA I98:20-c,for replacing the District's Artificial Athletics Turf Fields, and raise and appropriate up to $125,000 for this purpose with such amount to be funded from the year-end undesignated fund balance, and further, to name the School Board as agents to expend from the Artificial Turf Field Replacement Trust. (Majority vote required)

 

YES - 1036  59.6%    PASSED

NO - 701     40.4%

 

ARTICLE 7:

Shall the District establish a non-lapsing Athletic Field Revolving Fund in accordance with RSA 194:3-c to be funded by receipts from the use of the District's athletic fields for the purpose of maintaining and replacing the athletic fields. Further to raise and appropriate the sum of one dollar($1.00).  Withdrawals from the revolving fund will be made on an annual basis as needed. (Majority vote required) 

 

YES - 1252 72.0%    PASSED

NO - 487    28.0%

 

Total ORCSD votes cast today:  1890

 


Monday, March 4, 2024

The Race Is On, But You Wouldn't Know It



[EDIT 3/9] The Candidates Forum on Thursday night implied that Andrea Chan and Rebecca Blake weren't running -- at least they weren't announced as candidates.  Watch the forum here; it starts around 56 minutes in.  There's also a piece in Fosters.

I'm on vacation, so this will be my only post before election day.  Here are last year's voting instructions; no guarantee that they'll apply this year.

Election Day, Tuesday, March 12, 2024

There are contested school board elections on March 12.  Vote at your usual polling place; same day registration is available.  

The campaigns seem silent; at least I haven't seen any sign of them online or driving around.  There's a students' candidate forum scheduled for 6pm, March 7 in the ORHS auditorium.  I haven't seen any commitment to making it available online, and there's a very spotty history of timely posting of Candidates Night videos because the district tries to remain at arms length, but hopefully Alex is on it and we'll get to see something before election day.  Sometimes the PTOs, the teachers' guild or Oyster River Equity put out voting information; I haven't seen any of that yet, but be on the lookout.

The ORCSD board consists of seven members: four at-large seats and three town-specific seats, one each from Durham, Lee and Madbury.  You must reside in the town to hold the town-specific seat, even though voters from all three towns get to vote for or against you. School board terms are three years.

No one asked me this year, so I didn't give anyone my usual free advice for a contested race.  I'll give it here for everyone; it's mostly too late for this cycle: (1) buy 100 coroplastic signs with stands, nothing fancy, last name in large, readable letters, (2) make a facebook page and post things to it, (3) maybe team up with another candidate and do a mailer, (4) make a sign with your name on it for Candidates Night, and (5) talk to voters at the transfer stations.

The Candidates

This year it's the three town-specific seats that are up for election.  Here are the candidates; I'll feed the names into facebook and link to any school-board specific pages that come up.  It looks like Seacoast Online / Portsmouth Herald is doing candidate stories;  I've found four so far, all dated February 22, so that may be it. I'll include those links as well.  Add to the free advice: (6) when the Portsmouth Herald asks questions, answer them.

Durham:

Andrea Chan  (no online candidate information found)
John Colwell  (Seacoast Online)
Kelly Ickes  (Seacoast Online)
Jason Kolligs (facebook)
Stephanie Pitts (Seacoast Online, facebook)

Lee:

Renee Beauregard-Bennett (no online candidate information found)
Rebecca Blake (no online candidate information found)
Brian Cisneros (Seacoast Online, facebook)

Madbury:  No candidate signed up


Of this list, I only know Brian Cisneros.  Let's see what information we can gather from publicly available sources.  I don't know these people so these are my best guess; it's possible I've found someone else with the same name.  Candidates, if you prefer I remove your photo or use a different image or bio, please comment below.  I'll try to keep this section unbiased and tell you who I'm voting for at the end.

DURHAM CANDIDATES


Andrea Chan

Andrea Chan appears to be the proprietor of Andrea Chan Photography, specializing in children's photography.  I didn't find any additional biographical information on Ms. Chan.


John Colwell

Mr. Colwell has a bachelor of science in chemical engineering, a bachelor of arts in German language, and is an engineer for a battery materials startup.  He moved to Durham in 2022, and he has a second grader and a soon to be kindergartener in the district.  This is his first time running for any office.

Kelly Ickes
According to her LinkedIn page, Ms. Ickes is an experienced leader and program manager with a diverse background developing team members and running education assessment programs, skilled in client management, staff development, program evaluation, program management, and project management.  She has no current employer listed, but had a 5.5 year stint as Director of Content Development-Accessibility at Cognia after 14 years at Measured Progress, and as a special education teacher before that.

Members are no longer allowed to endorse, but long-time chair and current holder of the Durham seat Tom Newkirk tells me that he served with Ms. Ickes on the superintendent search committee, and that she has kids in the district and has been active in PTO. Tom says her background in educational assessment makes her a "good fit."

Jason 'Jabo' Kolligs

Kudos to Mr. Kolligs, who's gotten it together enough to create a candidate facebook page.  He hasn't really posted much on it yet.  We don't get a bio, just an image with some emblems and words. From the image we can infer a wife, five kids and a doggie. We also get among his publicly available personal photos a "proud to be a Libertarian."  Libertarians / Free Staters were notoriously responsible for the chaos in Croydon’s schools a few year ago.

Stephanie Pitts
Ms. Pitts has a bachelors of science in environmental management, and lists her occupation as safety manager. She has no previous political or civic experience. She gave a pithy answer in her Seacoast Online piece, which I'll just quote here:
What would be your top three priorities if you are elected? 1. Ensure quality education is provided for all students, based on scientific principles and proven methods for education content and delivery.  2. Ensure public schools remain truly public and free from bias of politics, religion, or other cultural pressures.  3. Improve/ensure student safety at all educational levels from both internal and external threats (teacher/administrative screening, visitor policies, threats and violence, etc.).

LEE CANDIDATES
Renee Beauregard-Bennett 


Dr. Renee Beauregard-Bennett doesn't seem to have created a candidate page, but from her personal facebook page we find out that she's been Assistant Superintendent/Director of Student Services at SAU 16, Exeter Region Cooperative School District, since 2015.  That's an excellent credential for a school board member. Before that she lists special education at Dover Area School District.  

She's a local: Dover Senior High, UNH Political Science class of 2002, masters from Keene State and a doctorate of Education from New England College.


Rebecca Blake

I didn't find much relevant information about Rebecca Blake; judging from her publicly available facebook photos she has two school-aged children and a nice smile.

[Edit 3/5] I got a message from James Lolano that Ms. Blake is a para at Mast Way who told him she has decided to keep her job rather than seek a board seat. She apparently was unable to withdraw in time to stay off the ballot.  I have no reason to doubt Mr. Lolano, and RSA 671:18 indeed says district employees cannot serve on their district's board. I didn't find Ms. Blake listed in the district employee directory, so I cannot verify her district employment.  She is or was co-president of the Mast Way PTO.


Brian Cisneros


Brian Cisneros is the incumbent Lee representative; he's served seven years in the seat.  His day job is as Business Administrator for SAU 1, ConVal (Contoocook Valley) School District.  That's a recent change; he was Business Administrator for SAU 61, Farmington for many years. Brian applied for the ORCSD BA job last year, and appeared to be the front-runner, but the board ultimately chose Amy Ransom.

MADBURY

No one filed to run for Madbury's seat, so the winner will be determined by write in votes.  I've been told the plan is to ask folks to write in current at-large school board member Matt Bacon.  The plan makes sense.

I think of the district as a seven slice pizza, four for Durham, two for Lee and one for Madbury.  That's approximately the ratio of total property values of the towns, and of students from each town.  So if we were after some ideal of proportional representation, we'd have four reps from Durham, two from Lee and one from Madbury.  We currently have three reps from Madbury on the board, which is a bit lopsided. Basically everyone from Madbury who wants to be on the school board already is. After nine years of service, member Dan Klein is not seeking reelection for the Madbury seat.

The write-in plan rebalances the board a bit. Matt gets elected to the Madbury seat and resigns his at-large seat; the board is then free to appoint someone (presumably not from Madbury) for the remaining year of Matt's at-large term.  I suppose it's a good bet the board will pick one of the candidates that didn't win, perhaps from among the second placers.  That at-large seat will be on the ballot at the March, 2025 election.

It's very rare that there's some dispute in the district that pits the towns against each other, so the towns of the members and the at-large/town-specific distinction matter very little in practice.  The main difference is when an at-large seat is vacated, the school board gets to appoint a replacement to serve until the next election, but when a town-specific seat is vacated, the town gets to choose the replacement.

Who I'm voting for

This is the biased part of the post, where I give my opinion. This year it's pretty uninformed; feel free to stop reading now.  I'm away for a week so I'm going to vote absentee in the next day or two if I can.

I don't know who to vote for for the Durham seat. 

For Lee, I'm going to vote for Brian Cisneros, who's always done a great job.  Dr. Beauregard-Bennett seems like a great candidate as well, and I'd be more inclined to consider her had I seen any effort at campaigning.

For Madbury, of course I'm writing in Matt Bacon.

I'm voting YES on the remaining questions; please see my Guide to the ORCSD 2024 Deliberative Session for a bit more detail on the ballot.  I suppose I should report that the warrant was unchanged at deliberate session.  Two people thanked me for asking the questions I did, and three others told me I could have asked them at the budget hearing or budget workshop and not bothered the good folks at DS.

A cursory search didn't turn up a Guild or Equity questionnaire or anything from the PTOs; please let me know if I've missed anything and I'll add it here.


[Edit 3/6]  Rumor Report

I'm hearing rumors that: Andrea Chan and Rebecca Black want to withdraw but it's too late to get off the ballot.  It's only rumors at this point, but sometimes that's all we get. I'm leaving town in a couple of hours, so you all will have to sort this out yourself.  Candidates, if you disagree with anything, please comment below and I will incorporate your words.


Monday, February 5, 2024

ORCSD Deliberative Session Tuesday February 6, 2024

Last year I promised myself I wouldn't only post around election time, and yet here we are.  I'm not even a district parent anymore, as my boy graduated in June.  I'm still the middle school MATHCOUNTS co-coach with Ms. Gehling, and I was the NH state MATHCOUNTS coach this year.  On Saturday Oyster River made it into the state MATHCOUNTS finals, which are slated for March 9.

I'm probably like a lot of people and haven't been paying too much attention to the school district lately. Let's take this opportunity to catch up together.  There's of course been plenty of news in the intervening year, including a new superintendent who'll start in July.  It's after midnight on Monday morning so let's just focus on the immediate future, Tuesday's Deliberative Session.  I'll make it easy on myself and just watch and comment on the Budget Hearing video, pasting in screenshots as we go.  I'll skip the self-congratulatory introduction, which will just get me angry.

Tax Impact

Most people reading are probably more concerned about their taxes going up than the details of the Deliberative Session and the warrant, so let's start there.  We're given two tables:



I think the historical millages in the table add the local and state education lines, which is misleading as the district budget only affects the local ed line, but I'm too tired to worry about it. The Durham millage isn't helpful either; we want to use these as a proxy for how much our taxes will go up, so they should give us a pro-forma number when there's a town-wide reassessment.  

We calculate the estimated school tax increase in Durham as  .40/13.35=3.0%, in Lee as .82/15.32=5.4% and in Madbury as .97/19.20=5.1%.

If you're wondering why your tax bill hurts more in December than July, it's because there's not enough time from the election in March to calculate taxes to be collected in July, so July's bill is always half of the previous year's taxes.  Then the December tax bills are calculated to make up the total appropriated by the voters in March, so all the increase lands there. 

Deliberative Session Tuesday February 6, 2024, 7pm, Oyster River Middle School 

The ORCSD Deliberative Session is Tuesday February 6th, 7pm, at the new ORMS recital hall (1 Coe Dr, Durham) for the second time.  It will be Superintendent Morse's last DS as superintendent.

What's a Deliberative Session?

As I always say, the Deliberative Session is a real election where the citizenry gets to amend the budget.  It's the vestige of the traditional NH town meeting. Unlike most NH elections, same day registration is usually not available at DS.  So you need to be already registered to vote in one of the three towns to be given a voting card at DS. There is no provision for remote voting -- to vote at DS you must attend.

Attendance at DS varies between around 25 voters in bad weather to around 200 voters when there's a controversial issue.  It's worth showing up just to keep a small group of renegades from cutting the budget in half, like what happened in Croydon.  That's not likely to happen here because the voters can always choose the default budget on election day. 

The purpose of the Deliberative Session is to give the voters an opportunity to amend the warrant articles before they're voted on.  Some articles, such as negotiated contracts, cannot be amended.  Some, like the main budget, can.  A majority of voters at DS can change those numbers, overriding the judgement of the board.  Then on election day (March 12, 2024), the voters get to vote each possibly amended warrant article up or down.

Each warrant article (except the ones that elect people) is read at DS, then explained by a board member.  Voters can then line up at the podium, and when it's your turn you can ask questions that the panel, which includes the board, the superintendent, business administrator, district lawyer, maybe others, will attempt to answer. You're free to make a speech, but if your speech doesn't propose an amendment or comment on an already proposed amendment, you might want to think twice about making it. The safest amendments, in the sense you may be sure they are allowed and will survive a court challenge, are changes to the budget numbers.

Note from by John Parsons, used with permission; thanks John:  I'd like to add an observation to this statement you included: "You're free to make a speech, but if your speech doesn't propose an amendment or comment on an already proposed amendment, you might want to think twice about making it." I second that, but I'll be more blunt about it. The moderators at district meeting have generally been patient over the years with speakers veering, usually on purpose, off-topic to make points unrelated to the article/amendment at hand. Technically speaking, all comments are supposed to directly address the specific topic under discussion. Please, everyone, stay on topic. Leave your rants to the 'any other business' portion of the meeting near the end.


The Warrant

The Warrant is the name for the ballot, and Warrant Article is the name for a ballot question. The warrant articles are the subject of the Deliberative Session, so let's go through them.

Oh my, this is asking to appropriate $56.2M from taxpayers, up 5.7% from $53.2M in this article last year.  That's a lot, but it's good to see that it's only $319K (0.6%) above the $55.9M default budget (what we get if NO wins).  YES always wins in Oyster River, and the closeness of these numbers is one indicator that the board is doing a good job in these difficult inflationary times. In any case, there's not much savings in a NO win this year, making a NO campaign difficult. 

YES or NO is a concern for election day in March; at the DS any voter may propose an amendment to change the top line number. They're free to give a speech about what to cut if the amendment is approved, but the board has wide discretion and doesn't have to listen to anything but the number. If the number is lowered below the default budget (which cannot be changed), the usual YES voters could organize a vote NO campaign and then at least get the default budget.

 

Here we see the board adopted a goal near the high end of its usual increases, which is perhaps expected as they attempt to keep up with the recent inflation.  As for expenses, we got a nasty health insurance increase. The 15.1% is a `guaranteed maximum' for budgeting; often the actual number comes in less and the district gets to use the difference as a slush fund.  The next five aren't a surprise; these are contracts negotiated in previous years. That includes the middle school bond; the $583K is the first payment of a second bond. 

The Utilities number represents actual inflation.  The mental health counselor was hired to cover the increasing demand in our post-COVID world.  Music teacher Andrea von Oeyen has built Oyster River's strings program into a reported 260 students, which I think means an incredible 12% of Oyster River students are currently getting string instrument lessons through the school. The budget includes an additional strings teacher to share the load. 

The two new positions account for $237K of the $319K difference between the default budget and the proposed budget; I don't know about the rest.



It's getting late so I better move this along.  If you haven't seen ORITA before, it's because the Oyster River Intervention and Tutors Association is a new union. I believe they're paraprofessionals, so I'm not sure why they're not part of ORPaSS. We have the usual exasperating lack of context: no indication of how many tutors we're talking about, no report of the associated expenses for total wages, benefits, FICA, etc.  We're told the large number this upcoming year is due to the addition of health care for these folks.  There's no amending negotiated contracts, but maybe we can get some answers at DS.

Note from Krista Butts, used with permission; thanks Krista:  ORITA is not paraprofessionals, they are the interventionists and speech and language assistants (people who teach speech and language but aren’t specialists.) These are teachers, most are fully certified, that have been getting paid an hourly rate just above paraeducators and are designing curriculum for up to 7 different classes a day. The majority of their classes are made up of kids who don’t meet benchmark or classroom expectations but do not qualify for an IEP.



This is the middle school solar array fund. The school has the option to buy the solar array after seven years.  This article first appeared in 2021 so this will be the fourth year.  It's a good move financially to buy the array, so to that end we put away $125K every year.  

The fund balance is the unspent money at the end of the year. The boilerplate `No amounts to be raised from taxation' is misleading.  What really happened is this money was already raised from taxation in March, 2023 so doesn't need to be added to the March, 2024 total. Unspent funds that are not diverted by a warrant article like this offset the following year's taxes, so however it's phrased, passing this article extracts an additional $125K from the citizenry.


This fund is new.  The district now owns two turf fields, with the older high school field (built in summer 2016 at a cost of $2.3M) needing major maintenance. The $125K is not a one-time expense; this is expected to be a recurring article that annually puts away what is presumably the estimated annual cost to maintain two turf fields.  The life of a field is 10 to 13 years, so I don't think the math works out here; in 13 years we'll have collected $1.625M, not enough for one field, let alone two. Then again, I can imagine the installation costing more the first time than subsequent times.

It was Dr. Bob Barth who back in 2015 successfully worked to get the board to pay an additional $260K for safer, more expensive fill rather than tire crumb for the turf field, citing cancer concerns. Bob sadly passed away in November, 2023.  Rest in peace, Bob, you were a model to us all.  Bob is survived by his wife, former school board chair Maria Barth, and his children and grandchildren.

Even though it's funded from the fund balance, surprisingly the article is missing the boilerplate about `no amounts...' (at least on this slide).  The amount may be amended at DS.




This is yet another fund dedicated to maintaining the fields. This fund is used to park the rent collected from renting out the athletic fields. It's a nice idea, almost certain to pass.

There's not much here to amend at DS;  you could change the dollar to a penny, I suppose.  My view of these funds is that they almost always contain money that would otherwise be in the pockets of taxpayers.  That's true here; without this fund the receipts go into the operating account, where they add to the fund balance and offset next year's taxes.  Now that I'm a grumpy old man and no longer a district parent, I'm inclined to believe that the money is better off with taxpayers. But I can see how it makes sense for the district to try to fill some coffers by stashing away unspent money, in order to ease the pain of the shocks that will inevitably occur.   

Revenue

This is an ominous warrant, because in addition to a large increase in the operating budget, we see a trend of new warrant articles that aren't one-time expenses, but are intended to be annual appropriations. We see how the warrant asks for money to be added to various funds this year. The warrant doesn't explicitly indicate that the opposite is happening as well: taxes are being lowered by withdrawals from other funds.  That gets us to the subject of revenue.


The warrant is about expenses, but of course the taxpayers are on the hook for expenses minus revenue.  In the world of municipal accounting, withdrawing savings to pay for expenses counts as revenue, which is a bit of magical thinking.  There are some actual revenue increases on this list: the increase in tuition income and in interest income.  School Nutrition revenue is a wash with additional School Nutrition expenses.  The rest are withdrawals from funds (and retained fund balance, otherwise unspent money this year). These withdrawals achieve a one-time reduction of a recurring cost, so have the effect of shifting some of the tax increase to the following budget year. 

It's 3:40 am so this will have to be it.  See you all tomorrow (Tuesday) at the Deliberative Session.

Wednesday, March 29, 2023

Day, Gelsey and Newkirk elected to ORCSD Board

 





Congratulations to Denise Day, Giana Gelsey and Tom Newkirk, all elected to the Oyster River School Board. Congratulations to former Chair Michael Williams, now elected moderator. Congratulations to the school district for successful passage of the budget, with 75% voting YES, and for passage of the solar array set-aside.

There's nothing at all surprising in these results. All the candidates ran for uncontested seats. 

Tom Newkirk's term is only one year. It's the remainder of Yusi Turell's term, who resigned from the Durham seat. Tom is returning after a one year absence, as he decided not to seek reelection in March 2022. Before that, Tom served ten years on the board, seven as chair. 

This will be Denise Day's fourth three year term. She is probably the favorite to be Chair this year, having served as Vice Chair under Chair Williams. Picking a Chair is the board's first job. 

This is Giana Gelsey's first term on the board, after falling short last year.

In Lee, incumbent selectman Scott Bugbee bested newcomer Erik Johnson by 23 votes, 299 to 276. Deb Schanda and Katrina Rusteika won the hotly contested Lee Library Trustee race. Congratulations to all the winners.

Here are the school district results; thanks to Todd Selig and Durham Friday Updates.

SCHOOL DISTRICT UNOFFICIAL RESULTS (Durham, Lee, and Madbury Combined Ballots from all three precincts.)


ARTICLE 1:

For Moderator (1 Year) (Vote for not more than one)

Michael Williams - 1081  ELECTED


ARTICLE 2:

For School Board At-Large (3 years) (Vote for not more than two)

Giana Gelsey - 925  ELECTED
Denise Day    - 972  ELECTED


ARTICLE 2:

For School Board Durham (1 year) (Vote for not more than one)

Tom Newkirk - 1064  ELECTED


ARTICLE 3:

Shall the District raise and appropriate as an operating budget, not including appropriations by special warrant article and other appropriations voted separately, the amount set forth on the budget posted with the warrant or as amended by vote of the first session, for the purposes set forth therein, totaling $53,211,098. Should this article be defeated, the operating budget shall be $52,953,910 (Default Budget) which is the same as last year with certain adjustments required by previous action of the District or by law; or the District may hold one special meeting in accordance with RSA 40:13, X, and XVI to take up the issue of the revised operating budget only. The School Board recommends this appropriation. (Majority vote required)

Note:
Fund 10 = $51,679,884 (regular operating budget); Fund 21 = $890,214 (expenditures from food service revenues); Fund 22 = $600,000 (expenditures from federal/special revenues); Fund 23 = $41,000 (expenditures from pass through funds).

YES - 894 74.7%    PASSED
NO   - 303 25.3%
 

ARTICLE 4:

Shall the District raise and appropriate the sum of $125,000 to be added to the Facilities Department, Maintenance and Replacement Trust which was established in March of 2017. This sum to come from the June 30 fund balance available for transfer on July 1. The School Board recommends this appropriation. (Majority vote required). No amounts to be raised from taxation.

YES - 985 82.1%   PASSED
NO   - 215 17.9%


Total ORCSD votes cast today: 1273

Sunday, March 12, 2023

Friday, February 3, 2023

Day, Gelsey, Newkirk unopposed for school board


Three Candidates File For Three Board Seats

The filing period for municipal elections is over as of 5pm today, and we have our candidates for school board.

There are two at-large seats up for reelection.  The two winners serve three year terms.  At-large means the candidates may come from any of the three towns.  Two candidates filed:  Denise Day, who has served on the board for the last nine years, and Giana Gelsey, who ran and lost last year.

The Durham seat is also up for election. A candidate must reside in Durham to run for the seat, though voters from all three towns get to vote in the election.  The term is only one year, the remainder of Member Yusi Turell's term, who has resigned. Only one candidate filed for the seat: Tom Newkirk. Tom served on the board for 10 years, starting in 2012, seven of those as chair.  Tom chose not to seek reelection in March, 2022; he gave himself last year off.

Though the possibility of a write-in campaign exists, in the past whenever we've had as many candidates as seats on the ballot, they've always all won.  So allow me be the first to congratulate Denise Day, Giana Gelsey and Tom Newkirk for their likely election to the ORCSD board.  Congratulations, and thank you for your service.

I should mention that someone filed to run for school board today and withdrew later today.  Since they're not running, I'll preserve their privacy and not mention their name.  I will say that this person also volunteered to serve when Member Kenny Rotner passed away in 2018, but was not then appointed.  If I had to guess I'd say this person was somewhat reluctant to serve this time, but commendably stepped up when it appeared the seat might not be filled, and honorably withdrew when Giana Gelsey filed and the person saw their service was not necessary.  I want to thank them for their willingness to serve.  If you're out there, please let me know if you want me to tell folks your name.

Chair Williams Likely to Become Moderator

[EDIT: 2/9/23 I learned at the Deliberative Session that Rick Laughton decided not to run for moderator.  Sorry for the error, folks.]

Two Candidates Run for Moderator

We have a real race for moderator.  As usual Rick Laughton filed; he's been the only moderator I've ever known.

In a surprising development, current School Board Chair Michael Williams filed to run for moderator.  I was sad when Michael decided not to run for school board again.  I'm glad he's staying involved in the district.  

The main function of the moderator is to run the Deliberative Session in February.  The 2023 DS is coming up on Tuesday, February 7, 7pm in the ORMS Recital Hall. It's a real election where a majority of the voters in attendance get to amend the proposed budget.  The various questions on the possibly amended budget get approved or denied on election day in March.

I have also seen the moderator running around on election day, though I'm not exactly sure what their job is then. 

Selectboard Race in Lee

I try not to spend too much time on Lee in this blog, but I'll relay important news when I get it. Unofficially I hear there are two candidates for the Lee Selectboard seat, incumbent Scott Bugbee and newcomer Erik Johnson. 

The Lee Deliberative Session is tomorrow (Saturday) 9 am. I won't be there because I co-coach the ORMS Mathcounts team, which is competing in the Seacoast Regional Mathcounts Competition tomorrow morning at UNH.  With any luck we'll advance to the State Competition in March.

I'll see you at the ORCSD Deliberative Session on Tuesday.  Stay warm, everybody.


Tuesday, January 31, 2023

Three School Board Seats Up, Deliberative Session Tuesday Feb 7


Three Board Seats Up for Election

Greetings, fellow denizens of Oyster River.  I'm sorry to only write around election time, but that's how it works out some years.  Better late than never, I suppose.

It's not too late to run for school board.  There are three open seats, two at-large seats with a three year term, and the Durham seat, with a one year term this time.  You need to file in person at the SAU office by 5pm this Friday 2/3/2023. (That link only talks about two open seats; the district should fix that.)  

The three school board seats are divided into two races: at-large and Durham.  The two largest vote getters for the at-large seats are elected.

It's not too late to run for moderator either, but for as long as I've been paying attention Rick Laughton always runs unopposed.

A few people have asked me about running for school board, but as of noon 1/31 only two people have filed to run. Vice Chair Denise Day is running for her fourth term at-large, as she was first elected in March, 2014.  

Surprisingly, former Chair Tom Newkirk has filed to run for the Durham seat.  Welcome back Tom!  Tom was the T in T.E.A.M. back in 2012, one of the four candidates of the clean slate that gave this blog its name.

We still need one more candidate to file for at-large in order to fill all the seats.  Go for it; you know you want to.  If someone wants details on what's involved in running, please feel free to contact me.

Deliberative Session, Tuesday February 7

Draft Warrant
click to enlarge

The ORCSD Deliberative Session is Tuesday February 7th, 7pm.  For the first time, it's at the new ORMS recital hall.  As I always say, it's a real election where the citizenry gets to amend the budget.  It's the vestige of the traditional NH town meeting. Unlike most NH elections, same day registration is usually not available at DS.  So you need to be already registered to vote in one of the towns to be given a voting card at DS. There is no provision for remote voting -- to vote at DS you must attend.

Each warrant article (except the ones that elect people) is read at DS, then explained by a board member.  Many, such as negotiated contracts, cannot be amended.  Some, like the main budget, can.  A majority of voters at DS can change those numbers, overriding the judgement of the board.  On election day in March the voters get to vote each possibly amended warrant article up or down.

This year the warrant is short.  Article 3 is the budget, 52.3 million dollars.  If NO wins, we get the default budget, which is $257K (0.5%) less.  NO on the budget never wins in Oyster River.  Article 4 asks to divert $125K to the fund to buy the middle school solar array.  There's the usual fib about "no amount from taxation" -- it really means they got this money through taxation last March and they're not giving it back. 

At the Deliberative Session, the only real amendments that make sense are to change these budget numbers. It's too late to petition to add a warrant article; the deadline was Jan 10, 2023. 

Attendance at DS varies between around 25 voters in bad weather to around 150 voters when there's a controversial issue.  It's worth showing up just to keep a small group of renegades from cutting the budget in half, like what happened in Croydon.  (That's not likely happen here because the voters can always choose the default budget on election day.)  See you there.

Board Member Yusi Turell Resigns

We had a surprise before Christmas when board member Yusi Turell resigned, effective March 3, 2023.  She stated she was going back to graduate school to complete her Ph.D.  She didn't take my advice to "just say no to grad school."

Yusi's conscientious announcement before the filing period allows her seat to appear on the ballot this term, avoiding a board-appointed candidate serving for a partial year, which happens to be how Yusi herself began her board service.  Yusi is currently serving in the Durham town-specific seat.  There's one year left in her term, so the winner of the Durham seat in March will only serve that one year before the seat goes up for election again in March, 2024 for a full three year term.

Yusi was first appointed in September, 2020 to take over member Kenny Rotner's seat, who had sadly passed away the previous month.  I supported Yusi's appointment enthusiastically.  Much like Kenny, Yusi was often the conscience of the district, concerned with any negative impacts on any stakeholders as a result of board decisions. While Yusi and I didn't always agree over the ensuing years, I know she always acted in the best interest of the district.  

Yusi Turell Resigns
I'd say her major accomplishments were getting a DEIJ Coordinator for the district and expanding World Languages, especially Mandarin, as well as leading the board's COVID response.  I see I'm mostly repeating her resignation letter, which I'll just include here; please click to enlarge. 

Thank you very much for your service in these difficult times, Yusi, and good luck with graduate school and all your future endeavors.

Board Chair Michael Williams Retires

In another surprise, this one after Christmas,  Chair Michael Williams, whose seat is up for reelection this year, announced he won't seek another term on the school board.  Michael has served six years, two as chair.  He ran for board and lost in March 2014, was first elected to the board in March, 2017, elected Vice Chair in March 2020, and first elected Chair in March, 2021, when Chair Tom Newkirk decided not to run for chair again.

I've always been a big fan of Michael's.  He has an analytic, engineering mind that I can identify with. I can usually count on him to ask the question I've been shouting at the screen.  In general he's always taken my writing seriously, reaching out to correct my many mistakes, which I appreciate. I'll miss him.

I was dubious that he'd make a good Chair.  He'd always been a bit of an iconoclast, the 1 in a number of 6-1 votes. I thought that rebellious streak wouldn't be compatible with being chair.  But I was wrong.  Michael is an excellent chair, keeping the board running smoothly under his leadership in a controversial time.  I'm sorry to see him go.

His accomplishments as chair are numerous, including guiding the district through COVID,  hiring  DEIJ and Communication administrators, building the new middle school, and new programs like MTSS (suicide prevention). I think Michael was responsible for the slick and slightly risky plan to finance the new school.  It involved two loans spaced over time; fortunately the district locked both interest rates in below 2% I believe, getting done before the recent rate hikes. 

Car Charging at ORMS
In December Chair Williams complained that the $900K spread between the proposed budget and default budget seemed too big. Business Administrator Sue Caswell pushed back, attributing the increase to the high school loan being paid off.  That number persisted for a while, but now it's down to $257K.  I missed why, but it seems Michael was right.  

Michael and I had a little fracas last year when I reported a rumor that the electric car chargers at the middle school would be free.  Michael denied that, and I accepted his denial.  It turns out the rumor may be correct after all; please see the superintendent's memo on the right. I don't think this has been voted on yet; in that year old post Michael promised a NO vote.

Thank you very much for your service, Michael, and good luck with all your future endeavors.

Business Administrator Sue Caswell Retires
Sue Caswell Resigns

Speaking of Sue Caswell, she too announced her resignation in January.  It's been expected for a while that both she and Superintendent Morse would retire this year or the next; the end of an era.  Her resignation letter (right) enumerates a number of accomplishments.

Sue's work is always outstanding.  We went from having many issues in our annual audit before Sue was in charge, to getting a clean audit report for many years in a row at this point.  She recently supervised the move to Tyler financial software for the district, a major project that just started producing the payroll in January. (Coincidentally, the Town of Lee is in the process of abandoning Tyler for another vendor.)

Sue's always been kind to me, taking the time to respond to my inquiries and straightening me out when I go off the deep end on some district finance topic.  She started at Oyster River about the same time I started paying attention, so I've never known any other Business Administrator in the district. I was fortunate to be on the finance subcommittee of the strategic plan committee years ago, which was very well run by Sue, and, IMHO, produced a report that put those other subcommittees to shame. I'll miss her.

Thank you for your service and good luck in the future, Sue.

Nutrition Director Doris Demers Retires

Doris Demers Resigns
Continuing the exodus of board and administrators, Nutrition Director Demers is resigning as well.  Doris accomplished many things in her tenure with us.  I especially liked her inclusion of fresh, locally sourced food in the menus. There's also the creation and management of the district's End 68 Hours of Hunger program, where food insecure students are discreetly sent home with a backpack of food (and sometimes other items) on Fridays. 

Doris was responsible for making free lunch to available to any child during the last few summers, and for arranging for the delivery of meals (free to those eligible, I recall) to homes during the pandemic.

She successfully oversaw the expansion of the Moharimet cafeteria, the upgrade of the Mast Way facilities, and the construction of facilities in the new Middle School. 

I'll miss you Doris.  Good luck in the future.

We can all catch some of Doris's cooking at the ORHS Sustainability Club's Community Dinner of locally sourced food this Thursday, Feb 2, 5:30 pm at ORHS. I'll see you all there.

High School Students Engage in Risky Behavior


That's not exactly news, is it?  What's new is we have the latest preliminary Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS) results. It's always shocking to read these things.  The preliminary results lack the context of the aggregated state results for comparison, so we'll just gawk.  This one is dated November 2021, so I think reflects the state pretty deep into the pandemic.


The news on substance use is good, or at least improving.  The small silver lining of the disruption caused by a global pandemic, I suppose.



I think "down 16%" on the slide actually means down 16 points, i.e. the 2019 number is 20.9% + 16% = 37%.  So this is a pretty huge decline.

The slides in the packet lack some of the numbers I recall hearing at the meeting.  Here's a link to the actual preliminary report.  The percentages reported are of the students who answered the question; some questions are widely answered while others aren't; check the report for details.

The sexual and dating violence numbers were particularly disturbing, with 5.2% of ORHS students, including 10.3% of seniors, reporting they had been "physically forced to have sexual intercourse when they did not want to." That sure sounds like rape to me. 39 of the 46 yes respondents were female. 

Similarly depressing numbers were: 4.9% of (overwhelmingly female) students report being coerced into sexual behavior with someone at least five years older.  10.9% of (overwhelmingly female) students (81 total) including 15.3% of seniors report experiencing sexual violence last year.  28.2% of students, including 40.1% (!) of female students, reported someone they were going out with tried to purposely control them or emotionally hurt them.

14.8% of students reported making a suicide plan, and 6.9% of students reported attempting suicide last year, with 45.5% reporting they rarely or never sought help when depressed.  Wow.  

43.4% report texting or emailing while driving -- stop that!  11% of students reported carrying a weapon, 2.2% reported carrying a weapon in school the last 30 days.  4.0% report being threatened with a weapon at school last year.  16.3% report being bullied on school property, 18.4% report being bullied online.

35% of students reported that most of the time their mental health was not good.  4.3% reported their basic needs were not met by adults in their household.  

There's more; check out the report.

Spelling Flame


I'm about to engage in the lowest form of internet comment, the spelling flame, frowned upon since at least the early eighties. Unfortunately I think it's warranted as it was an early press release of our new Communications Specialist Gen Brown, hired in August for $70K + benefits, about $100K annually paid by the district taxpayers.

I really wanted to leave it alone. Due to a glitch I can't seem to fix, I no longer get these emails. This release was first pointed out to me November 23. I saw a facebook post about it a few days later, and I thought for sure it was embarrassing enough that the district would fix it. I procrastinated as long as I could, but here we are two months later and we're still proudly trumpeting the 2022 Excellence Trough Equity Conference [sic] including a student from Oyster River Regional High School [sic]. For the kind of money we're paying, we need to insist our schools are referred to by their correct names.



It's quite an innovative education strategy. In lieu of actual instruction, students just need to drink from the ORCSD Trough of Excellence.

Oyster River Students drink from the Trough of Excellence 



This is going to get me in trouble like the DEIJ Coordinator stuff last year, isn't it?  Speaking of which...

As predicted, our DEIJ Coordinator Rachel Blansett spent the first term on a needs assessment, and forming relationships.  It's nice to have a job that often includes lunch.  Additionally, the superintendent points out, Coordinator Blansett has presented to the NH state legislature and other groups around the state.  She has some fun professional development planned for her second term; here's the summary slide:




I see a "this work" -- time to drink!  See you all at the Deliberative session Tuesday, February 7.