Rejecting Newmarket, the board chose to enter into a multi-year tuition agreement with Barrington, essentially continuing the status quo. As it has in the past, the board chose to redraw the bus line to shift students to Mast Way, but to exempt current Moharimet students and their siblings. A strings teacher and a math tutor were added to the budget while total spending increased less than 1%.
Barrington, which has no high school of its own, wants to keep its "choice" model. Barrington students get to choose which high school to attend. Currently the choice is between Dover, Coe Brown and Oyster River. The taxpayers of Barrington pay the Dover tuition, which is the lowest of the three. Parents who choose to kick in a couple thousand dollars extra to make up the difference in tuition can send a child to Coe Brown or Oyster River.
ORHS currently has around 70 tuition students from Barrington, under the terms of a Memorandum of Understanding that is renewed annually. The current tuition of $13,000 does not include special education. The current MOU has Barrington fully responsible for the special education cost incurred by its own students.
I haven't read the actual agreement yet, so this is just relaying how it was described at the board meeting. The newly signed agreement has a tuition of $14,000 that includes the expected special education load. Superintendent Morse stated the agreement has Barrington paying for additional staffing to serve its own special education students beyond the expected load.
$14,000 for 2015-2016 seems like a bargain to me. When you count special education Barrington is probably already paying more than that now.
Barrington has agreed to setting a minimum number of students each year and to pay Oyster River 95% of any tuition shortfall in the event of underenrollment. This allows Oyster River to hire based on projected enrollment without having to bear the risk of Barrington students choosing not to come to ORHS.
The agreement states that when at least 125 Barrington tuition students enroll, ORHS becomes Barrington's "school of record." The school of record is required to accept any students that might move to Barrington during the year. I'm not sure what else the ominous sounding term implies, but it does seem like something Barrington wanted out of the deal.
This is essentially the status quo option (continuing with Barrington) with a couple of twists. Barrington is agreeing send between 50 and 130 more students, to ramp up on a specific schedule, and to guarantee the minimum number in advance. This gives Oyster River the predictability for planning it desires. Barrington locks in the ORHS option, gets a great tuition rate that includes special education and gets ORHS as its school of record.
It seems some have taken this high school functional capacity number of 915 as a magic indicator of overcrowding. The number comes from a capacity study -- it's 85% of the maximum capacity, which counts each classroom as 22 seats (board policy) or the number of workstations in it if it's fewer. The capacity study assumes that around 160 empty seats is full capacity. If board policy was 23 seats max, functional capacity would be closer to 950.
Nonetheless the board made the right choice opting for Barrington over Newmarket. The transition is going to be so smooth as to be unnoticeable. That's in marked contrast to the Newmarket option, which would have been a large shock all at once.
Until I see the actual agreement I'll reserve judgement on how I'll vote in March.
Redraw with Family Exemption
The Redraw option was moribund a month ago, when the main choice seemed between K2/34 and managed enrollment. I'm going to take a bit of credit here and say my letter helped revive what has been the district's traditional remedy.
The board mentioned, but did not take up the Mast Way Choice suggestion of my letter. The idea there was that if a family opted to transfer their child from Moharimet to Mast Way, the district would provide transportation. Thus every family at the overcrowded Moharimet would have chosen to be there. The superintendent stated that currently anyone wishing to transfer may, but without action from the board transportation could not be provided.
|My unofficial attempt to redraw the map to reflect the vote of 12/18/2013|
The board easily approved the cuts proposed by the administrators:
The board was presented with a list of ways to add to the budget:
The board chose to approve the Math Lab Teacher, which was changed to a Math Lab Tutor at a much lower cost.
The board actually went beyond the proposed 0.8 Strings Music Teacher. Instead the board approved a 1.0 Full Time Music Teacher to concentrate on strings. The new position coincides with an effort to reorganize the music department. Instead of the current building-based system, the plan is to switch to a "strands" system, where each music teacher potentially plies their trade in multiple buildings. Everyone seemed very enthusiastic about the new plan.
Maybe it was the distraction from the elementary school reconfiguration and the tuitioning deals, but the normally controversial budget process was not controversial this year. The budget gets presented to the public on January 14th, and to the individual towns in the weeks after that. A majority of voters at the deliberative session February 5th can change the numbers on any of the warrant articles. The voters get final approval on election day, March 11th. (calendar)
At the end of the December 11th meeting, the board voted to authorize the superintendent to reach out to David Taylor to avoid litigation.
The next regular board meeting is on a Thursday, January 2. Anybody out there want to run for school board?