[ORCSDCleanSlate accepts occasional essays from the Oyster River citizenry for publication, like this rather brave one here from UNH professor Ruth Sample. Professor Sample intends to present an amendment on this issue at tonight's Deliberative Session (Tuesday Feb 7, 7pm ORHS auditorium) so I recommend supporters and opponents of this position attend.
Full Disclosure: Dr. Sample and I have been married for 30 years. As a public service I provide all my spouses, I've included a link to the November 18 Budget Workshop Video and insets with the DEIJ job description from the February 5 board minutes for reference. - Dean]
WHY WE SHOULD REMOVE THE DEIJ
COORDINATOR FROM THE ORCSD BUDGET
Executive Summary
· We need to address the pressing DEIJ concerns of the school district.
· The current proposal prematurely creates a new administrative position that cannot address these concerns.
· This proposal was generated without a Needs Assessment and without the creation of an action plan with measurable outcomes.
· Before creating a new DEIJ position, we should hire one or more consultants with the relevant expertise to conduct such an assessment and create an actionable plan for ORCSD.
· DEIJ must include disability as a focus of our concern.
1. Some people may disagree with the need for
addressing DEIJ issues in the district. I
do not. I think it is extremely
important that we have a plan for addressing a whole range of problems related
to DEIJ. The problems identified so far
involve student behavior and language, diversifying our faculty, the
difficulty of discussing both history and current events in a politically
charged atmosphere, communicating with the public about DEIJ issues, and
managing the HB2 “divisive concepts” law.
We need to address all of these issues.
Proposed Job Description |
However, it is clear that no one person can solve the problems discussed in the Budget Workshop. Creating this position is premature.
Job Description, part 2 |
However, someone without experience in classroom teaching, curriculum development, human resources, and education law cannot address the problems that motivated this proposal. The position as described does not call for expertise in any single one of these areas. It is doubtful we could find someone with experience in all of them.
3. Did the board consider hiring an experienced consultant to get
us to a place where we can more clearly define what needs to be done, who
should be doing it, how it should be done before we establish a permanent administrative
position? The same money (without benefits) would get ORCSD 40 full days or 80
half days of consulting- which would provide ORHS with full day consulting
nearly once/week or half day consulting twice/week. A more strategic way to approach
DEIJ would be to start with an experienced consultant who can conduct
a needs assessment and establish an action plan with measurable goals.
Board member Tom Newkirk raised an important point in the Budget Workshop: he pointed out that we would need to hire one or more consultants with specific expertise in multiple areas, because whoever filled this position would not have sufficient expertise. The cost of the consultants would be in addition to the DEIJ administrator.
As board member Brian Cisneros pointed out, it is not possible to measure whether the DEIJ Coordinator is succeeding at their job. He is also correct when he said that it is not possible to explain this position, because the actual day-to-day duties of the DEIJ Coordinator are broad and poorly defined.
4. I suggest we start by hiring a consultant who
can conduct a needs assessment and establish an action plan. This plan would include measurable
benchmarks of success. Hiring a very experienced consultant at, let’s say,
$2500 a day would be far more flexible and cost effective than would be a
permanent administrator at over $100,000 plus benefits—as well as unspecified
consulting costs to help the administrator “fill in the gaps.” We should explore writing a grant to fund
this.
5. Finally, whatever we decide to do, DEIJ must be more broadly construed. The presentation to the Budget Workshop mentioned racial slurs in online chats, swastikas, the use of gender-neutral bathrooms, and George Floyd. There was no discussion at all of disability. In any given year, approximately 15% of our students in the district have disabilities with Individual Educational Plans or 504s. The proposed position, as described, in no way includes those with disabilities.
Thanks for posting this! XO
ReplyDelete