Sunday, February 20, 2022

We met the candidates


Moderator Michelle Hannon (left)
and Candidate Marie D'Agostino
on Candidates Night


Tuesday was the 2022 ORCSD School Board Candidates Night, this year hosted by the ORMS PTO.

I've been waiting for the video to be posted so I can watch it again and share the link.  As happens pretty much every year, my hopes are dashed (but not last year, which went great). It's been five days and still no video.  So we're left to my memory and some scrawled notes on the introductions. We're told the video will be posted; when it surfaces we'll see how I did. [Posted here; updating contents on 3/5/2022]

Unlike last year, the Teams format did not permit the audience to ask questions or make comments in the chat.  There was also no indication of how many viewers were watching; maybe someone involved can let us know.

The production had technical difficulties. The moderator, ORMS PTO co-chair Michelle Hannon, was perfectly audible when reading the questions, but it was often difficult for me to hear the words of the candidates. For the first few minutes it was just the reverberating room and the masks that muffled the audio. Then a loud fan kicked in to add some white noise to make it all a semi-intelligible exercise in frustration. Eventually even the computer couldn't take it anymore and crashed. When they came back a few minutes later the candidate audio was working great, though the moderator's audio had gotten worse.

They had to work pretty hard to mess it up this bad. I thought we'd get the usual Teams meeting, where all that's required for preparation is sending out Teams invite emails. Everyone is alone in their own space, masks off, a device with camera and mic up close and personal, perfectly audible, name under their image, with the occasional noise problem rectified with a request for non-speakers to mute. But on Tuesday they decided to tease us with a hybrid live/Teams event, cancel the live part that day, but still have the candidates together in person in a large, echoey room, masks on, with professional video cameras on tripods presumably being switched by a director. It didn't seem like the mics were close to the candidates, but one was sure picking up fan wind noise.

I've griped enough; on to the content. The candidates were given an opportunity to introduce themselves and then the first question was something like "what unique skills would you bring to the school board?"; I'll combine them; here's what the candidates said.

Matt Bacon (facebook) is the parent of five children. He has been a paraprofessional at a high school. He served in the National Guard, and serves in the Madbury PTO and as an ORYA coach, and on Madbury Zoning Board. Matt would bring his strong people skills and his ability to work with and listen to people with other opinions. 

Marie D'Agostino (no candidate web presence known) has lived in Lee sixteen years. She was a former member and chair of the Newmarket School Board.  She has 3 grown children and 7 grandchildren, 18 months to 18 years. Masters in Business Administration and Human Resources.  She's "semi-retired", consultant for Municipal Resources Inc., having worked as a school district business administrator in Kensington, Somersworth and (I think she said) Wakefield.  She's worked for Primex (insurance) as director of finance and human resources.  Expert in School Risk Management.  Open and closed schools, built schools, oversaw renovations. She oversaw the creation of SAU 101 out of SAU 64. Marie would bring her business administrator and school board experience in budgeting, negotiation and personnel.

Giana Gelsey (facebook) is the parent of a 4th and 7th grader. She serves as Moharimet PTO chair, on ORTV, the ORCSD Long Range Planning Committee, and the Madbury Water Resources Board. She puts her heart and soul and strong principles into everything she does.  She listens carefully to all -- every voice counts.  She supports the district's DEIJ work.  Giana would bring a strong science background and an understanding of different perspectives, having lived in Mississippi, Texas, Arizona, Minnesota and New Hampshire. 

Debra Harmon (facebook) has been in Lee 21 years, and has sent three children through the schools.  She has volunteered all 21 years, active in Cub Scouts, Boy Scouts, Girl Scouts, Otters, other activities and GO VOTE.  She has coordinated many events at Mast Way. Debra would bring her wide people and problem solving skills gained as a tour guide and a Delta Airline flight attendant for 22 years.  EDIT: A comment below says I've failed here to convey the full scope of Ms. Harmon's introduction and service, for which I apologize.  It adds Ms. Harmon was a Girl Scout Troop Leader (4 years) and ORMS PTO Treasurer for 4 years; please see the full comment below.  [I've edited the introduction a second time after watching the video.]

Heather Smith (facebook) has two children in the schools, in first and fifth grade.  She is a Senior Water Engineer.  She's chair of ORCSD's Long Range Planning Committee, and member and former chair of the Moharimet PTO, and serves on Chess Club, First Lego, Destination Imagination, Otters board, UNH Ocean Engineering External Advisory Board, and as an ORYA coach.  Heather would bring her unique curiosity, love of asking questions, love of digging down and understanding problems and coming up with solutions.

We've reached the end of my notes, where I couldn't hear much anyway and thought I'd just try again with the video when it was posted.  So much for that plan; I'll sit here and see what I can remember about some questions.

The candidates were asked something like: Paraprofessionals in the district do not make a living wage. What would you cut in the budget to remedy this?

My answer would have been to reject the premises: I don't know that paraprofessionals aren't paid a living wage -- I'd have to find out. I also don't know that if there was an issue, that cutting the budget would be the only way to address it.  What I do know is that every few years, including this year as reflected in Warrant Article 5, the district sits down with ORPaSS (The Oyster River Paraprofessionals and Support Staff), a genuine union presumably quite able to powerfully represent its members' positions, and they mutually agree to a contract that both sides generally claim to be pretty happy with. I vaguely recall back in the wake of the 2008 financial crash ORPaSS took a low raise to help out the district, while more recently the district has been willing to pay higher wages to remain competitive in order to continue to attract the best personnel.

As to not knowing the wage of paraprofessionals, one of my pet peeves with the board is when they present the negotiated contracts with the various bargaining units like ORPaSS, they only tell us the amount of the aggregate annual raise.  That's the number we're asked to vote on.  Some context, like the number of workers covered, their total wages and other costs (FICA, benefits, etc.) and total annual hours, would be very useful in actually evaluating the numbers we're being asked to vote on.  A similar comment goes for the tax rate increases presented as well.

OK, enough of my answer, what of the candidates?  Most candidates wisely didn't take the bait of this softball gotcha question.  Ms. Gelsey began by saying a budget is a balance, which is exactly right.  Most of the rest answered in similar vein, with I believe only Ms. Harmon taking the bait and addressing cuts. 

I know, my recollection here isn't very helpful.  Frankly that was my impression of the entire event -- the questions were not really designed to differentiate the candidates, so now their answers all blend together in my head. 

There were other questions:  Superintendent Morse will retire soon; what qualities should we look for in a new superintendent?   Most of the candidates took the opportunity to praise Dr. Morse and expressed hope we could find someone with similar qualities. Ms. D'Agostino offered that this was a difficult time to hire as (I think she said) 18 other school districts in the area were also looking to hire a superintendent.

There was an expected question about the process of ending the masking requirement in district buildings. This was during the difficult to hear part, I think; I can't remember much if any of the answers. Ms. Gelsey said there was a committee that evaluated the data weekly and reported to the board; the masks would become optional when various COVID thresholds were met.  I think it was Mr. Bacon who said we should continually revisit the thresholds in light of changing information. 

I think there was another question about working with people with differing views.  Unsurprising, the candidates invariably thought this was a good idea and would endeavor to do so if elected.

Clearly I'm not having much luck recalling Candidates Night.  I guess it's that "awful Zoom call" nightmare I just want to put out of my mind.  If the video is posted, I may revisit and expand this.

The word is that the Teacher's Guild has done a questionnaire which hopefully will differentiate the candidates a bit more than Candidates Night.  We'll talk about that, and about spending in the district, soon, so stay tuned.

[EDIT 3/5/2020:  I went through the released video with the improved sound and updated the introduction and unique skill answers.  I may further update.]



Monday, February 14, 2022

Tuesday is Candidates Night, Budget Unchanged at Edifying Deliberative Session

The Candidates are on Facebook

It looks like this year's school board race will, like last year, take place largely on Facebook.  Hmmm.

Here's a list of links to the candidate facebook pages.

Matt Bacon  https://www.facebook.com/Matt-Bacon-Oyster-River-School-Board-111888801405648

Giana Gelsey  https://www.facebook.com/Giana-Gelsey-Oyster-River-School-Board-111653044766731

Heather Smith   https://www.facebook.com/Heather-Smith-Candidate-for-Oyster-River-School-Board-101776459105333/

Debbie Harmon https://www.facebook.com/DHarmon4ORCSD

Marie-Therese D'Agostino  [no web presence found as of afternoon 2/13]


Candidates Night is this Tuesday, February 15

They don't seem to be advertising it very much, but Candidates Night is scheduled for this Tuesday, 6 pm, February 15.  That's six pm, dinner hour.  Not sure why they're starting so early.

Candidates Night is the only formally scheduled event for candidates on the election calendar, besides election day I suppose.  It used to be moderated by the District Clerk, with the PTOs supplying snacks. Sometimes I'd be the only audience to show up.  There was a tradition where the district would make an substantial effort to record video of the event, which then never seemed to get posted by election day.

This year it's hosted by the Middle School PTO.  The elementary PTOs did a great job hosting a virtual meeting last year, so I guess that they decided to continue that. It was spread over two nights last year, with a pretty big attendance -- around 50 folks on Zoom and a similar amount on Facebook Live, neither of which we're using this year.

It's right here on the school board meeting schedule.There's contradictory information on the Middle School PTO's facebook page.

Apparently there will be an actual live event at the middle school.  At least that's the recent announcement, made Friday evening, 2/11/22, and still current on noon Monday 2/14.

UPDATE 4pm 2/15: Due to a room change the meeting is virtual only.  

Click here 6 pm Tuesday February 15 2022  for the Candidates Night Teams meeting (Teams is Microsoft's version of Zoom).  

Last year they solicited questions from the public ahead of time. There was also an opportunity to put your questions in the chat during the event.  

This year they're running out of time to advertise and solicit questions. They solicited questions on the various ORCSD Facebook PTO pages on February 5, which I didn't see even though I think I subscribe.  In any case they really should cast a wider net, so please ask your question here.

February 15th is pretty early in the race, three weeks before election day.  Last year they pushed the virtual meeting to about two weeks before the election day, which I thought worked pretty well.

Kristin Forselius wins the 2022 Oyster River Distinguished Service Award

Congratulations to Kristin Forselius, this year's receiver of the Oyster River Distinguished Service Award.  Former Chair and outgoing school board member Tom Newkirk presented the award to Ms. Forselius at Tuesday's Deliberative Session.  Tom cited Kristin's work on the Oyster River DEIJ Community Group, the DEIJ Coordinating Committee, the ORMS Diversity Club, Project Graduation, Community book groups, and reviving the ORHS First Robotics Club.



Budget Unchanged at Edifying Deliberative Session

It was a well-attended Deliberative Session on Tuesday (video), with at least 184 voters in attendance. An attempt to amend Article 3 (the $52.1M budget) to remove the DEIJ Coordinator position and $100,000 from the budget failed by a vote of 21 in favor, 163 against. No other amendments were moved, so the warrant will be presented to the voters on Election Day March 8 unchanged from what the school board approved in January.

Ruth Sample at the 2022
 ORCSD Deliberative Session
It was my wife Ruth Sample who made the motion to remove the position, and I seconded it. It's painful to commit social suicide in front of the entire community, but it is enlightening.

Ruth wasn't convinced the DEIJ Coordinator position was well-defined or justified.  Like many folks, she hadn't been paying much attention to the school board until a couple of days before the Deliberative Session.  She did her usual thorough job researching the issue, reviewing the November 18 Budget Workshop and the February 2 school board meeting among other stuff.  She wrote it up and I posted it the afternoon of the Deliberative Session.  She made it very clear she very much supports DEIJ work in the district, but thought the coordinator position was unjustified and premature.

I tried to talk her out of it.  I wanted to focus on the spending. I knew coming out against the DEIJ coordinator position was touching the third rail in this town.  But Ruth persisted, and if there's one thing I've learned in my years, it's Ruth is usually right about most things (Happy Valentine Day, honey!). So I agreed to help, drafting the amendment in writing (future amenders take note) and a request for a secret ballot on the amendment, the idea being that some folks might be more likely to vote in favor of the amendment in secret, as it's a touchy issue.

Article 3 was presented by board members Brian Cisneros and Yusi Turell, with Yusi specifically focusing on justifying the DEIJ Coordinator position. Then the floor was opened and Ruth bravely went to the podium to propose her amendment: to remove $100,000 of the $130,000 budget for the DEIJ Coordinator from the budget and use the remaining $30,000 for consultants to help come up with an actionable plane.  (Technically, if passed, all the amendment would have done is alter the budget; it's up to the board to carry out the intent of the vote or not.)  There was silence and no second forthcoming, so I seconded it -- I couldn't leave Ruth hanging.  She then proceeded to request a secret ballot in writing, signed by five Oyster River voters.

I expected people to speak forcefully in favor of the DEIJ Coordinator position, which they did.  What I did not expect was a frontal assault on that underpinning of American democracy, the secret ballot. This was from what I assume was a room mostly full of progressives. Coming into the event I'd have assumed they were on the pro-democracy team. 

International Law re
 Secret Ballots
One person asked, incredibly, if there's any way to "counter" the secret ballot request, maybe by getting more than five signatures. A bold legal idea indeed, gaining applause from the crowd.  Alas, it was ruled against by the district lawyer advising the moderator.  Democracy prevails.

Another person asked, even more incredibly, if we could just have a "non-binding" show of hands before the secret ballot.  Just between us, as it were.  The lawyer again appeared to rule that having a public show of hands was against the spirit of the secret ballot that had been lawfully sought. Again the mob was thwarted, but democracy lived to fight another day.

I'm not naming these folks because they're good people who I like and hope to continue to be friendly and cordial with in the future. But perhaps a little self reflection is in order.  I'll guess the motivation for attempting to thwart the secret ballot is to identify the DEIJ dissenters among us, perhaps to subject them to future scorn.  Democracy is tough; the scorners will have to settle for just me and Ruth.

As to the substance of Ruth's objection, Peter Taubman, retired New York high school teacher and professor, offered, "I find it astonishing in 2022 we are actually debating a position that over that past thirty years has been taken for granted in not only public schools in New York, but some of the best public schools in New Hampshire, and I will tell you, in every single prep school in the Northeast." 

We shouldn't even debate?  Can't we ask if the DEIJ problems in Oyster River are on a scale equal to those in a New York City school?  Of course they aren't. The average NYC public school is under 20% white and serves a much more socioeconomically challenged population than Oyster River. Can't we ask if the size of the school system should impact the decision to create a new position?  Of course it must.  

The New Hampshire districts with DEIJ positions include Exeter and Manchester. Oyster River has about 2200 students carried by $2.5B in equalized taxable property value. Manchester has around 9000 students carried by $12.9B of property.  Exeter Coop has 4500 students and a $9.9B value. (If I read this report correctly where we seem to have to add up the coop and the individual towns of SAU 16: 3.6 coop + 2.6 Ex + .8 Br + .4 EK +  .5 KE + .3 NF + 1.7 St.  Not sure about this.) So at the same salary, Oyster River's cost per student for the position is twice Exeter's, and four times Manchester's.  The burden of the position on Oyster River taxpayers is four times as much as in Exeter and five times as much as in Manchester.  We probably wouldn't expect a school district with 400 students to employ a full time DEIJ Coordinator or Chief Equity Officer -- where is the line?  It's clear there's plenty to debate.

We heard the claim at various times that we've had plenty of consultants; that we need someone to coordinate acting on their advice. (This seems like an admission that once we hire a DEIJ Coordinator, we can look forward to a future with even more DEIJ consultants.) Contrary to the story, Superintendent Morse recently told Ruth that paid consultants were not used to produce the report that suggested the position.  Ruth read the report, which apparently doesn't really recommend the ORCSD DEIJ Coordinator position either. I'm not going to publish that report because as far as I can tell it's not (yet?) a public report.  

In fact the whole process seems rather non-transparent.  The committee is a "superintendent's committee" which seems to exempt it from public meetings and recorded minutes.  It seems to exempt it from being mentioned on the district website as well. I can appreciate the need for secrecy in these HB2 divisive-concept times, but we also have Right-To-Know Laws. In fact, the board probably should tread very carefully: they're still operating under an injunction to obey the RTK law under threat of contempt of court.  The increased scrutiny was a result of the bad board in 2011 being found guilty of violating RTK twice. 

As for what a report produced with a consultant might look like, Ruth offers this example, UNH's response to a professor (seemingly abetted by his wife) sexually preying on students that came to light in the media.  It includes dozens of action items, each one assigned to a particular person at UNH, with a description, expected completion date and current status.

Most of the DEIJ Coordinator-type job descriptions don't detail what is meant by DEIJ or which "affinity groups" are unincluded victims of injustice intended to be helped.  But board member Turell did so in her slide, which I appreciate.  Certainly we need to recognize that every time taxes go up, it's harder for those socioeconomically challenged to remain in town.  Driving out the people we intended to serve -- that's one way to solve the problem, I suppose.

Anyway, I do want to give the community props for good meeting form -- we had almost 200 people in attendance, two in-order, properly formed motions to call the question (both of which succeeded in getting 2/3), in addition to Ruth's amendment in writing and a properly executed secret ballot request.  It's almost like we know what we're doing. 


[I want to write more about the spending in the district, but I better post this much before Candidates Night is over. - Dean]



Friday, February 11, 2022

Board Member Turell Defends DEIJ Coordinator Position

[Board Member Yusi Turell sent me the following essay for publication here.  It appears she added an introduction to her presentation notes for the Deliberative Session on Tuesday. Thanks Yusi. I'll write more about the Deliberative Session and the School Board race soon.]


Thank you to everyone who braved the wintery roads to attend Tuesday’s Deliberative Session. All warrant articles passed, including the 2022-23 budget as presented, and there was overwhelming support for the DEIJ Coordinator position. The warrant articles will be presented to all Durham, Lee, and Madbury voters in the March 8 municipal elections.

For loyal readers of the ORCSD Clean Slate blog (I include myself!) who weren’t able to attend the Deliberative Session or view the full recording, I wanted to share how the DEIJ position was introduced on Tuesday. No new information here - just another way to access the information and a response in the ‘official blog record’ to Dr. Sample’s recent guest essay.

DEIJ Presentation
2022 ORCSD Deliberative Session

[That's supposed to start at Yusi's presentation at 13:23; if not please click here - Dean]

Here is the text of the DEIJ Coordinator introduction:

DEIJ stands for Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Justice. It reflects that we live in an increasingly diverse country and community, which is a strength to be celebrated. It reflects that all children in our schools, and all people inside and outside of our schools, have the right to safety and belonging - and the right to see themselves represented in what and how they are learning. As a district, Oyster River has had a longstanding commitment to supporting ALL students.

  • We have policies on transgender rights and anti-racism, and our sustainability policy highlights the intersections between social, environmental, and economic justice. Our special education program has a $10-million budget and a dedicated director who was recognized as this year’s NH Special Education Administrator of the Year.
  • Over the past 5 years, we have worked with consultants to provide DEIJ-related trainings and to recommend how the district can improve our work in this area.
  • We have held a number of community forums that have been well-attended.
  • Individual teachers have updated their curricula to include more diverse perspectives and build students’ critical thinking skills, and taken steps to ensure all students feel welcome and seen. This is despite NH legislation that threatens teachers’ livelihoods if they teach about so-called ‘divisive concepts.’
Despite this progress, as a district, we have hit our limit in the expertise and capacity necessary to do this work skillfully and consistently. Dr. Morse likens this situation to one we faced with technology ten years ago. Ten years ago, early adopting teachers and principals who were into technology supported and taught it. It was a ‘hit or miss’ approach, some classes used and taught technology while others did not. It was not until the district supported a comprehensive and systemic approach, inclusive of tech support and tech integration, that we could guarantee the skills students were taught at each grade level.

Likewise, we currently have a ‘hit or miss’ approach to DEIJ. Some teachers are doing amazing work. The primary role of the DEIJ Coordinator will be to work with our educators to develop best practices for curriculum and instruction, as well as support compassionate, equitable policies and practices. This work is consistent with our Vision of a Graduate and our strategic priorities of a Multi-Tiered System of Support (MTSS) and Socio-Emotional Learning (SEL). It is also what we heard from the many teachers, students, and parents who wrote in or shared their experiences - and how, despite good intent, we were falling short of our commitment to support every student. Beyond consultants - who deliver a training or write a report then leave - we need a member of the district team who can build trust and relationships and be available to support situations as they unfold.

By design, this is an integrated position. We are not carving off a separate DEIJ fiefdom, we are ensuring that administrators and faculty have extra expertise and capacity to meet their goals. We already have an Assistant Superintendent who oversees K-12 curriculum and instruction, but she needs support to integrate DEIJ skillfully. Similarly, our special education director, Catherine Plourde, has noted the critical overlaps between DEIJ challenges and mental and emotional health. Because this is an integrated position, the indicators we will use to measure the success of this role will be similar to how our administration is evaluated currently - e.g., MTSS metrics and academic achievement especially with historically marginalized groups; the Youth Risk Behavior Survey and other data on SEL; the development of vertically aligned K-12 competencies; and so on.

I know there will be other questions in the discussion, so will turn back to Brian.


Tuesday, February 8, 2022

Ruth Sample Argues Against ORCSD's Proposed DEIJ Coordinator Position

[ORCSDCleanSlate accepts occasional essays from the Oyster River citizenry for publication, like this rather brave one here from UNH professor Ruth Sample.  Professor Sample intends to present an amendment on this issue at tonight's Deliberative Session (Tuesday Feb 7, 7pm ORHS auditorium) so I recommend supporters and opponents of this position attend.  

Full Disclosure: Dr. Sample and I have been married for 30 years. As a public service I provide all my spouses, I've included a link to the November 18 Budget Workshop Video and insets with the DEIJ job description from the February 5 board minutes for reference.  - Dean]


WHY WE SHOULD REMOVE THE DEIJ COORDINATOR FROM THE ORCSD BUDGET

                         - Ruth Sample, Lee


Executive Summary

·       We need to address the pressing DEIJ concerns of the school district. 

·       The current proposal prematurely creates a new administrative position that cannot address these concerns.

·       This proposal was generated without a Needs Assessment and without the creation of an action plan with measurable outcomes.

·       Before creating a new DEIJ position, we should hire one or more consultants with the relevant expertise to conduct such an assessment and create an actionable plan for ORCSD.

·       DEIJ must include disability as a focus of our concern.

 

 

1.  Some people may disagree with the need for addressing DEIJ issues in the district.  I do not.  I think it is extremely important that we have a plan for addressing a whole range of problems related to DEIJ.  The problems identified so far involve student behavior and language, diversifying our faculty, the difficulty of discussing both history and current events in a politically charged atmosphere, communicating with the public about DEIJ issues, and managing the HB2 “divisive concepts” law.

We need to address all of these issues.


Proposed Job Description
2. The proposed budget includes a line item for a DEIJ administrator at an ongoing cost of over $100,000 plus “exceptional benefits.”  This new position is supposed to address these problems.

However, it is clear that no one person can solve the problems discussed in the Budget Workshop.  Creating this position is premature.

Job Description, part 2
The requirements listed in the job description, as well as discussed in the Budget Workshop presentation, make this clear.  I listened with great interest as ORHS math teacher Vivian Jablonski described some of the behavioral incidents that provided challenges for classroom teachers.  Dr. Morse described some of the challenges he faces when dealing with these problems because, as he put it, he lacks “lived experience.”  A DEIJ Coordinator is supposed to remedy this.

However, someone without experience in classroom teaching, curriculum development, human resources, and education law cannot address the problems that motivated this proposal.   The position as described does not call for expertise in any single one of these areas.  It is doubtful we could find someone with experience in all of them.

 


3.  Did the board consider hiring an experienced consultant to get us to a place where we can more clearly define what needs to be done, who should be doing it, how it should be done before we establish a permanent administrative position? The same money (without benefits) would get ORCSD 40 full days or 80 half days of consulting- which would provide ORHS with full day consulting nearly once/week or half day consulting twice/week. A more strategic way to approach DEIJ would be to start with an experienced consultant who can conduct a needs assessment and establish an action plan with measurable goals.

Board member Tom Newkirk raised an important point in the Budget Workshop:  he pointed out that we would need to hire one or more consultants with specific expertise in multiple areas, because whoever filled this position would not have sufficient expertise.  The cost of the consultants would be in addition to the DEIJ administrator.

As board member Brian Cisneros pointed out, it is not possible to measure whether the DEIJ Coordinator is succeeding at their job.  He is also correct when he said that it is not possible to explain this position, because the actual day-to-day duties of the DEIJ Coordinator are broad and poorly defined.

 

4.  I suggest we start by hiring a consultant who can conduct a needs assessment and establish an action plan.  This plan would include measurable benchmarks of success. Hiring a very experienced consultant at, let’s say, $2500 a day would be far more flexible and cost effective than would be a permanent administrator at over $100,000 plus benefits—as well as unspecified consulting costs to help the administrator “fill in the gaps.”  We should explore writing a grant to fund this.

 

5.  Finally, whatever we decide to do, DEIJ must be more broadly construed.  The presentation to the Budget Workshop mentioned racial slurs in online chats, swastikas, the use of gender-neutral bathrooms, and George Floyd.  There was no discussion at all of disability.  In any given year, approximately 15% of our students in the district have disabilities with Individual Educational Plans or 504s.  The proposed position, as described, in no way includes those with disabilities.

 

Sunday, February 6, 2022

The Race Is On

It's been forever since I've posted.  I have been watching the school board meetings from under my desk.   There's a fair amount to report that I'll try to get in here.

School Board Candidates Declared

Two at-large seats on the ORCSD board are up for election this March 8. Five people have filed to run for the two seats:

  • Matthew Bacon, Madbury
  • Marie Therese D’Agostino, Lee
  • Giana Gelsey, Madbury
  • Debra Harmon, Lee
  • Heather Smith, Durham
Voters in all three towns are given identical ballots; each may vote for up to two of the above (or write in). The top two vote getters win a three year term as an at-large school board member.  The ORCSD school board consists of seven members, three of which are town-specific seats, one each from Durham, Lee and Madbury, and the remaining four are at-large members, and can be from any of the three towns. 

This list is from Durham Friday Updates. When I talked to the SAU office I believe they said Ms. D’Agostino's name was listed as Therese-Marie;  I suppose it doesn't matter.  

Friday Updates also reported Rita Bartell Drum from Lee is a candidate.  According to the SAU office, Ms. Drum has withdrawn her candidacy.  Since she did so during the filing period her name will not appear on the ballot.  It's going to be a less interesting race without her; she's also known as Penny Schlachter.
Candidate Statement Summaries from 9/16/2020

Detailed biographies of the candidates will have to wait until the campaigns get going, but I'll tell you what I know so far. Matthew Bacon, Heather Smith and Debra Harmon vied for a board appointment when member Kenny Rotner passed away in August, 2020; their statements (as summarized by the district secretary) are in the inset above.  Ms. Harmon was chosen as one of the two finalists, but ultimately Yusi Turell was appointed, and then elected to a seat last March.  Giana Gelsey, Heather Smith and Matt Bacon all serve on the Moharimet PTO Executive Council.  Giana Gelsey serves on the Long Range Planning Committee, did a great job running Candidates Night last year, and has been a voice for science and sanity in response to the pandemic, presenting a petition in August signed by I believe 167 community members in support of mask mandates.  Marie Therese D’Agostino appears to have been a business administrator for school districts in Somersworth and Wakefield. 

Tom Newkirk and Al Howland to retire from ORCSD board

Neither of the incumbents, Tom Newkirk and Al Howland, are seeking reelection.  They've each served on the board 10 years. Al is a Durham Councilor as well.  They were both an integral part of the TEAM, Tom, Ed Charle, Al and Maria Barth, who all were first elected in 2012, successfully wresting control of the board from the tea partiers who had taken over.  My involvement with the ORCSD school board, and this blog, got started to support their effort.

I'll need a much longer essay than I'm willing to write tonight to thank Tom and Al for all the great service they've done for the district over the past decade. The community owes them a great debt for rescuing the school system in 2012, and for all the work that followed.  The new Middle School, the track and field at the high school, and the expansions of Moharimet and Mast Way are only the most tangible results of their long service.

Thanks Tom and Al for everything you've done for us all.  Good luck in your future endeavors.

Deliberative Session this Tuesday, February 8

The Deliberative Session, called Annual Meeting Session I in official calendars, is this Tuesday, February 8, 7 pm in ORHS Auditorium. It's a real election, the vestige of the traditional New England Town Meeting. Registered voters meet and vote; a majority of them can change the wording of the ballot questions.  The actual ballot is then voted on at Annual Meeting Session II, known to most of us as election day, March 8, 2022.

Unlike most NH elections, same day registration is usually not available at DS. So you need to be already registered to vote in one of the towns to be given a voting card at DS. As far as I can tell, there is no provision for remote voting -- to vote at DS you must attend.  There will be a separate area set up for those who would like to participate without a mask.

Each warrant article (ballot question), except the ones that elect people, is read at DS, then explained by a board member. Many, such as negotiated contracts, cannot be amended. Some, like the main budget, can be. A majority of voters at DS can change those numbers, overriding the judgement of the board. In pandemic times a majority might not be very many, which is scary -- they can rewrite the budget for the entire district.

The end of this post from 2018 describes the rules by which the DS is run; I won't repeat them here. I'll review the warrant articles to be voted on in the next section.

The Warrant

The school board has approved the warrant for 2022; it's the ballot with the candidates and questions to be voted on. 
2022 Warrant, Articles 1-4

2022 Warrant, Articles 5-6




Articles 1 and 2 elect the moderator and school board; these are ignored at Deliberative Session.  

Article 3 is the main budget, which will be $52.5M (including $400K from the other warrant articles).  The board set a goal of 4.1% increase this year, which is slightly higher than the usual 3%.  This is a particularly tough budget year that includes initial financing of the second half of the new middle school. According to the superintendent's public hearing presentation, the major expenses that determined the budget are:
That's an ominous lack of a number for the five (!) new positions.  Doesn't the current middle school already have custodians?

The Durham asterisk remains missing on the tax impact slide:

These are supposed to represent the change in the Local School property tax line, which is really the only line the district partially controls.  These changes in millages are always presented without context, namely the current rate.  Let's look those up.

The predicted Durham increase is .85/15.37 = 5.5%, the Lee increase is .16/19.80 = 0.8% and Madbury decreases .06/16.29 = 0.4%.   As the asterisk indicates, that's before changes to the property base in the three towns are incorporated.  I believe it also includes predictions about state aid to the towns that may not be accurate. 

The default budget  (what we get if NO on Article 3 wins) is $412K less than the proposed operating budget, saving 1% (and causing a big fracas) should the budget be voted down.

Warrant Articles 4 and 5 are the ORESPA (office and custodial staff) and ORPaSS (paraprofessional and support staff) agreements, both four years long, which is unusual.  The numbers listed are the total year on year increases, total raises essentially. They're again hard to assess without context relating the current sizes of the expenditures.  I won't bother to look those up right now; negotiated agreements are not allowed to be amended at DS.  Warrant Article 6 calls for $125K to be put aside for the eventual purchase of the middle school solar array.
 
Only Articles 3 and 6 may be amended at DS this year. 

Middle School To Open

The new middle school is getting close to opening.  The middle school students have February 17 off, I believe to allow the teachers to set up in the new building.  Move-in day is scheduled for Monday February 28th.  It's exciting -- I'm looking forward to coaching Mathcounts in the new building on that first day.  

After the old building is vacated it will be torn down and athletic fields erected, with the project completing by summer.   There are plans to give away bricks from the oldest part of the building, built in 1935, as souvenirs.  

Principal Richard announced tours of the old building on (I believe) Friday February 11, 4-6 and Saturday February 12, 10-12. They'll be doing community tours of the new building Thursday Feb 24 10 - noon and 4 - 6, and middle school parent nights on Tuesday, March 1st for 5th & 8th grade and Thursday, March 3rd for 6th & 7th grades.

Catherine Plourde, Special Education Administrator of the Year

ORCSD's own Director of Student Services Catherine Plourde won the award for 2022 New Hampshire Special Education Administrator of the Year.  The award is given annually by the New Hampshire Association of Special Education Administrators.  Congratulations to Catherine and to all the ORCSD special educators and staff that make her look so good.

I was honored to be on the Zoom call with NHASEA, along with other district parents supporting Catherine's nomination.  There were around ten of us on the call; the folks doing the interview said they never had so many parents supporting a candidate.  It was very moving to hear the personal stories of how Catherine had helped so many district students.  The award is richly deserved.

Parent Angry at School Board

District parent Bruce Fenton has taken to using his three minutes of public comment time at school board meetings to express his anger to the school board about the mask mandate in school buildings.  His initial, quite reasonable gripe is that his son, an ORHS freshman recovering from brain surgery, gets headaches from wearing of masks, so should be medically excused from the mandate.  I'm surprised some post surgery accommodation couldn't be worked out between the district, the Fentons and the boy's doctor, but here we are. 

Mr. Fenton generally goes on to accuse the board and superintendent of authoritarianism, bad faith and hypocrisy, building to a crescendo where he variously demands the officials resign, beat him, or hug him.  Several times Mr. Fenton removed his mask during his public comment; a recess was called and the cameras were turned off, presumably while the police escorted Mr. Fenton from the meeting for violating the mask rule.

Enough commentary from me; I've tried to cue up some of the clips to the dramatic parts but I suggest watching the comments in their entirety.  [I seem to have to click the box then click YouTube to start at the cued-up time; your mileage may vary.]










Lee Hires and Fires Bad Cop

There's a surprising story in which the Lee police chief hired a young officer who was fired in Dover for lying about initiating a high speed chase that resulted in two deaths.  The Lee chief knew that the state had revoked the young officer's certification to be a police officer as a result of the incident, yet hired the officer conditionally.  The chief let him go when the arbitration process concluded without restoring the officer's certification.